There are endless digital health solutions that exist today. Butnot all of themare grounded in evidence. That’s why on Tuesday, the Peterson Center on Healthcarelaunchedthe $50 million Peterson Health Technology Institute, an organization that will evaluate healthcare technologies on their ability to create better health outcomes and reduce costs.
“Throughout Covid and with the huge influx of investment in the space, there’s been a tremendous proliferation of digital health companies offering a huge array of solutions. And that’s fantastic,” said Caroline Pearson, executive director of the Peterson Center on Healthcare, in an interview. “We think the innovation is excellent. We also recognize that those companies are making claims about how they’re going to improve lives and reduce healthcare costs and all sorts of other things, but it is very difficult to tell which of those claims are supported by data and are really evidence-backed.”
New York City-based Peterson Center on Healthcare is a nonprofit organization that is focused on making healthcare more affordable and is funding the Peterson Health Technology Institute. The institute will function as an “independent evaluator” of digital health solutions, and will analyze their clinical effectiveness, how they’re affecting healthcare costs, their ability to improve health equity, and their privacy and security capabilities, Pearson said.
Additional information on the institute’s methodology and assessment framework will be released after Labor Day, according to Pearson. This framework will be created in partnership with the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, a research organization.
To determine which companies to review, the institute will be working with purchasers — payers, providers and employers — to understand what solutions they are considering using. The companies also have to be relatively established in the market.
The institute’s reports on digital health companies will be published on its website and will be free to access. These reports will reveal which solutions are effective, and which ones are subpar.
“Our hope is really that we can help drive improvement across the industry both by really drawing attention to the phenomenal technologies that we know exist but maybe aren’t getting enough attention or don’t have the best salesperson, then I think flag areas where for some companies, there’s an opportunity to continue to improve their efficacy,” Pearson said.
在美国投资数字医疗万博官方网站手机版$15.3 billionin 2022, and the global digital health market is expected to hit$1.5 trillionby 2030. While health tech is attracting funding, solutions are still oftenlacking in evidence, leaving many healthcare players confused on which solutions to work with.
“Increasingly, as we’ve talked with folks that are actually responsible for purchasing and paying for some of these technologies — which are really the health plans, the providers and the employers — [they’re] saying, ‘We’re totally overwhelmed. We’re just getting bombarded with sales pitches from health companies,’” Pearson said.
But ultimately, the Peterson Health Technology Institute aims to support the patients who are affected by digital health solutions, she added.
“We really want to raise the bar on digital health and help health technology realize its full potential,” Pearson said. “We want to be an asset to everyone in the industry who’s trying to do phenomenal work, as well as to the patients who I think deserve to have somebody helping make sure that the care they’re getting is high quality and safe and effective.”
Other organizations focused on digital health research include Evidation, which recruits consumers into studies for health companies, and NODE.Health, a nonprofit that is focused on creating and gathering evidence on digital health. However, NODE.Health is a membership organization that brings together providers to help understand digital tools.
Photo: Urupong, Getty Images